首页> 外文OA文献 >A return to 'civilisational geopolitics' in the Mediterranean? Changing geopolitical images of the European Union and Turkey in the post-cold war era
【2h】

A return to 'civilisational geopolitics' in the Mediterranean? Changing geopolitical images of the European Union and Turkey in the post-cold war era

机译:回到地中海的“文明地缘政治”?后冷战时代不断变化的欧盟和土耳其地缘政治形象

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The prevalence of the discourse of ideological geopolitics during the Cold War meant that both Turkey and the EU belonged to the West by virtue of their ideological orientation. In the absence of this prevalent geopolitical discourse, both the EU and Turkey have spent the 1990s trying to locate themselves geographically. Drawing on the literature on critical approaches to political geography and international relations, this article seeks to answer the question of whether the EU's post-Cold War security discourse on the Mediterranean in general and on relations with Turkey in particular point to a return to the earlier discourse of civilisational geopolitics. The article also presents a reading of Turkish policy makers' attempts to resist EU's representation of Turkey in 'non-Europe' (as with the 'Middle East' or the 'Mediterranean') as boundary-producing practices which have served to underline the boundaries between the 'West' and the 'non-West'. © Taylor and Francis, Inc.
机译:冷战期间意识形态地缘政治话语的盛行意味着土耳其和欧盟凭借其意识形态取向都属于西方。在缺乏这种流行的地缘政治话语的情况下,欧盟和土耳其都在1990年代试图在地理位置上定位自己。本文以关于政治地理和国际关系的批判性方法的文献为基础,寻求回答以下问题:欧盟在冷战后关于地中海的总体安全论述,特别是与土耳其的关系是否特别指向前者文明地缘政治的论述。文章还介绍了土耳其决策者试图抵制欧盟在“非欧洲”(如“中东”或“地中海”)中代表土耳其的做法,以此作为强调边界的做法在“西方”与“非西方”之间。 ©泰勒和弗朗西斯公司。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bilgin P.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号